The U.S. Department of Education held a very important meeting Wednesday in Washington, DC for its debt collection vendors (and potential vendors). The star of the event was the detail given about the procurement process for the government’s new student loan debt collection contract.
Dwight Vigna, Director of ED’s Default Division, opened the meeting by reiterating the two goals of everyone working in and for the Default Division:
- Be respectful to borrowers and find the best solution that will resolve the borrower’s debt regardless of the commission being paid.
- Increase the FSA overall collection rate on a year-to-year basis even as the inventory increases annually.
As of September 2011, the size of ED’s default portfolio is $33,502,777,441, made up of roughly 3 million borrowers and 15 million active loans.
The recovery rate among collection agencies is just shy of 11.5 percent. ED’s goal is to bump that to 13.86 percent in 2012 and grow it to just about 14 percent in 2015.
How much money is at stake for collection agencies? The commission pool in 2012 is $500 million and is projected to reach $700 million in 2015. Understandably, more ARM firms are looking to participate in the contract as it can mean steady revenue for years. And there is an upcoming opportunity to participate in the lucrative contract.
The current contract — called the 2009 contract — is due to expire at the end of 2012. But ED will be taking extension options that will keep it going through the second quarter of 2014. After that, a new contract will need to be in place.
According to the draft contract deadline, the official procurement process will begin in August 2012. ED will begin their market research in January 2012 and should be ready with the official RFPs/RFQs and other documents by August. Early October 2012 is the tentative deadline for bids from qualified collection agencies. After that, awards are expected to be announced in February 2013 and accounts will start flowing later that year, with an appropriate overlap between the two contracts.
Although the crowd at the meeting pushed for it, ED would not commit to a total number of collection agencies that would be on the new contract. With ED’s portfolio growing by the day, it would seem to follow that more than the current 22 agencies would be on the contract. But the department has launched a new sub-contracting program that is designed to give more opportunity to small businesses (more on that in a bit).
Agencies seeking the ED debt collection contract would be well-advised to start planning now. The data security requirements alone can prove too high a hurdle to leap for many companies (and that was discussed at length in the meeting as ED is converting to a new computer system and all collection agencies are required to get re-authorized). But the payoff is extraordinary.
For ARM companies that do not wish to go through the full procurement process, ED has a new formal sub-contracting program. Tasked with the directive of including more small businesses in collection work, Vigna said that his group decided sub-contracting would be the best path to follow.
Beginning with the current performance score reporting period (essentially the fourth quarter of 2011), collection agencies on the contract have the opportunity to score additional points by subcontracting out some of their portfolio. The agencies are not required to subcontract, but total performance scores determine future levels of account placements, so there is good incentive to do so. Agencies that forward 10 percent or more of their accounts to a small business subcontractor will receive five additional points (out of a possible total of 100).
To keep everything on the up-and-up, ED requires that a random sample of accounts be forwarded so that agencies on the contract don’t cherry-pick the best accounts and leave the rest to their subcontractors. Accounts must be transferred within 10 business days of receiving them from ED and they must stay with the subcontractor for at least four months.
There was also much discussion about ED’s computer system conversion. In summary: things are going about as well as any system conversion goes (read: not awesomely), and people don’t particularly like the process, but it will be a better system so deal with it already.